Commentary

February 19, 2013

Hadiya Pendleton shooting: Teen fears desensitization to gun violence

Hadiya Pendleton shooting: Teen fears desensitization to gun violence

On January 30, 2013 Hadiya Pendleton was shot when an individual jumped a fence and opened fire on her and a group of her friends. They were in a Chicago park under a canopy taking shelter from the rain. The shooter had mistaken the teens for a group of rival gang members and the victims were taken to the hospital. Her friends survived but Hadiya was killed in the shooting. There were witnesses and gang members in the area, however no one would talk to police about what happened.

She was 15 years old and attended King College, one of Chicago’s top 10 public schools in a selective program and along with her classmates had performed at the presidential inauguration parade with her drill team and band.

This is another example of how gun violence is happening around the nation and in my own town. Gun violence has increased so much, it seems like it has become an epidemic that the government is trying to fix. I don’t believe that regulations can really solve the high rate of gun deaths that we are experiencing. It is in human nature to fight against one another, and without community, knowledge, and a way to stop the violence the situation will only get much worse. Guns are not the problem, it is the people that use and handle the guns. A minority of bad people make the rest of the majority of gun owners look bad.

Hadiya Pendleton shooting: Teen fears desensitization to gun violence

15-year-old Hadiya Pendleton was gunned down just days after performing in President Obama’s inaugural parade / Family photo

 

Five days ago, on Feb 15, President Obama visited the neighborhood where Hadiya died. He addressed Hyde Park Academy in Chicago saying, “When a child opens fire on another child, there’s a hole in that child’s heart that government can’t fill — only community and parents and teachers and clergy can fill that hole.” Just after listening to his speech, Destini Warren, a 14-year-old, left the audience to learn her sister, 18-year-old Janay McFarlane, was gunned down and died.

Guns did serve as a lifeline to the American people during the Revolution, but they were a tool to get food and for protection. It was essential for everyone to keep their guns and without them they wouldn’t have survived for very long. However, things have changed and times have become quite modern and the practical use for a gun has been diminished. It is a weapon meant to kill and for defense, and many seem to forget that. I don’t think that guns are a problem. The real problem is this culture we have today were many feel that guns are a toy. When people think of these machines as toys our communities fall into trouble.

For some reason, when I heard that Hadiya was killed, the news didn’t hit me as hard as when I heard of shootings in the past. The shooting epidemic sweeping our nation makes me fear desensitization to gun violence is becoming the norm for our country.

What really impacted me about this tragedy was Hadiya’s marching band background. I was in marching band for four years and I know it takes a lot of talent to do well in band. All gun deaths are tragic, but as a former band member, I hate to see someone so talented die.

I have said this many times before but I do feel that guns are not the problem. If we could get a sense of community, trust and mutual respect among each other, this could lead to the greatest decrease of violence that we have ever seen. A country of brotherly love, not desensitization, is something that we can all work to achieve, and this should be the sole aim of our government.



About the Author

Antelmo Rangel
Elmo is 18 years old and recently graduated from Edison High School. He now attends Fresno City College. He joined The kNOw Youth Media in June 2012. Elmo is self-described as silly, awkward and somewhat odd. He loves journaling, writing essays and drawing. He most loves oranges, kitties and strawberries! He wants to live a life of success, one that brings him true happiness in all stages of life.




  • http://www.facebook.com/noel.wolfpetersen Noel Wolf Petersen

    Keep up the good work, man. Good point about the recreational use of guns in America. That just reads irresponsibly. “Recreational” and “guns” in the same sentence? That’s just trouble waiting to happen. I want to see people get serious on and off the firing range. Toys don’t make good weapons and weapons don’t make good toys.

    • Anonymous User

      Guns can be used recreationally. Whats wrong with going out into the
      woods and shooting some tin cans on a log? I used to do it all the time.
      I would never dream of using a gun to kill anything (that includes
      animals!) I like guns, but I don’t like violence.

      Guns can be
      used to attack, to defend, and for recreation. I support the right to
      bear arms. Law-abiding citizens have a constitutional right to bear
      arms. The 2nd amendment cannot be infringed. There are areas in this
      country where recreational shooting is allowed, and the odds of someone
      getting hurt from this type of shooting are incredibly low.

      The
      majority of these shootings that you’re talking about were illegal from
      the start. The firearms were not purchased legally from a gun shop, but
      rather a street arms dealer. They were not sold to individuals who had a
      right to have them (individuals under 18 cannot own any guns without
      parental permission, individuals under age 21 cannot own handguns,
      period).

      I agree with a statement in this article that “guns are
      not the problem”. Guns don’t sprout limbs, walking around killing
      people. People who wield guns irresponsibly are at fault here, Not guns!
      Furthermore, there is a MOUNTAIN of scientific, statistical, factual
      data from credible sources that suggests that gun control actually
      increases gun violence! Why? Because like I said, the majority of these
      shootings are done by criminals who owned firearms illegally, not by
      law-abiding citizens who bought their guns at a shop.

      You
      take away the right to bear arms, who is impacted most? The criminal
      who never gave a crap about following laws to begin with, or the
      law-abiding citizen who is forced to follow this law even though they
      don’t agree with it? The criminals will continue breaking laws and
      buying guns illegally, while law-abiding citizens will be stripped of
      their right to defend themselves from these criminals. See
      http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp for more info.


BusTracker